Argentina vs French Polynesia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production over time
- Argentina
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 784 t against 0 t in French Polynesia, a difference of 784 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2013 it was French Polynesia ahead.
Argentina ranks 26th and French Polynesia ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 474.29 t | 0 t | 474.29 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 480 t | 0 t | 480 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — production, Argentina or French Polynesia?
- Argentina, at 784 t against 0 t in French Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — production between Argentina and French Polynesia?
- 784 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and French Polynesia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and French Polynesia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — production?
- Argentina ranks 26th and French Polynesia ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf