Aruba vs Congo: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production
Aruba
0 t
in 2024
Congo
0 t
in 2024
Aruba rank
28th
Congo rank
28th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production over time
- Aruba
- Congo
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Congo, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 28th and Congo ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — production, Aruba or Congo?
- Aruba, at 0 t against 0 t in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — production between Aruba and Congo?
- 0 t, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Congo?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Congo rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — production?
- Aruba ranks 28th and Congo ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf