Botswana vs Latvia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production
Botswana
0 t
in 2024
Latvia
0 t
in 2017
Botswana rank
28th
Latvia rank
28th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production over time
- Botswana
- Latvia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Latvia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 28th and Latvia ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — production, Botswana or Latvia?
- Botswana, at 0 t against 0 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — production between Botswana and Latvia?
- 0 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Latvia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Botswana and Latvia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — production?
- Botswana ranks 28th and Latvia ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf