Iceland vs Serbia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production
Iceland
0 t
in 2024
Serbia
0 t
in 2024
Iceland rank
28th
Serbia rank
28th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production over time
- Iceland
- Serbia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Serbia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — production, Iceland or Serbia?
- Iceland, at 0 t against 0 t in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — production between Iceland and Serbia?
- 0 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Serbia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Serbia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — production?
- Iceland ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf