Nicaragua vs Serbia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production
Nicaragua
0 t
in 2022
Serbia
0 t
in 2024
Nicaragua rank
25th
Serbia rank
25th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production over time
- Nicaragua
- Serbia
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Serbia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 25th and Serbia ranks 25th of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — production, Nicaragua or Serbia?
- Nicaragua, at 0 t against 0 t in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — production between Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 0 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Nicaragua and Serbia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — production?
- Nicaragua ranks 25th and Serbia ranks 25th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf