Slovenia vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production over time
- Slovenia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 t | 0 t | 1 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — production, Slovenia or Zimbabwe?
- Slovenia, at 0 t against 0 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — production between Slovenia and Zimbabwe?
- 0 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Slovenia and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — production?
- Slovenia ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf