Eritrea vs Tuvalu: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per area of cropland
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per area of cropland over time
- Eritrea
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 183rd and Tuvalu ranks 183rd of 195 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kg/ha | 2.65 kg/ha | 2.65 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 0.003 kg/ha | 2.28 kg/ha | 2.27 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha | 0.556 kg/ha | 0.556 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per area of cropland, Eritrea or Tuvalu?
- Eritrea, at 0 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per area of cropland between Eritrea and Tuvalu?
- 0 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Tuvalu?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Tuvalu rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per area of cropland?
- Eritrea ranks 183rd and Tuvalu ranks 183rd of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per area of cropland. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf