Afghanistan vs Aruba: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per capita
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per capita over time
- Afghanistan
- Aruba
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 kg/cap against 0 kg/cap in Aruba, a difference of 0 kg/cap.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 195th and Aruba ranks 195th of 212 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Aruba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kg/cap | 0.1388 kg/cap | 0.1388 kg/cap | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.001 kg/cap | 0.233 kg/cap | 0.232 kg/cap | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0 kg/cap | 0.092 kg/cap | 0.092 kg/cap | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per capita, Afghanistan or Aruba?
- Afghanistan, at 0 kg/cap against 0 kg/cap in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per capita between Afghanistan and Aruba?
- 0 kg/cap, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Aruba?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Aruba rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per capita?
- Afghanistan ranks 195th and Aruba ranks 195th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf