Australia and New Zealand vs Eswatini: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production

Australia and New Zealand
7.63 g/Int$
in 2024
Eswatini
7.68 g/Int$
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
54th
Eswatini rank
51st

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Eswatini
51015196119922024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 7.68 g/Int$ against 7.63 g/Int$ in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.05 g/Int$.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 54th and Eswatini ranks 51st of 193 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 5.54 g/Int$ 5.59 g/Int$ 0.0456 g/Int$ Eswatini
1970s 7.37 g/Int$ 10.32 g/Int$ 2.94 g/Int$ Eswatini
1980s 6.84 g/Int$ 8.98 g/Int$ 2.14 g/Int$ Eswatini
1990s 7.37 g/Int$ 5.59 g/Int$ 1.77 g/Int$ Australia and New Zealand
2000s 7.19 g/Int$ 4.41 g/Int$ 2.78 g/Int$ Australia and New Zealand
2010s 6.31 g/Int$ 4.26 g/Int$ 2.05 g/Int$ Australia and New Zealand
2020s 7.08 g/Int$ 7.11 g/Int$ 0.036 g/Int$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production, Australia and New Zealand or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 7.68 g/Int$ against 7.63 g/Int$ in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production between Australia and New Zealand and Eswatini?
0.05 g/Int$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Eswatini?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Eswatini rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 54th and Eswatini ranks 51st of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Eswatini: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-use-per-value-of-agricultural-production/australia-and-new-zealand/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-use-per-value-of-agricultural-production/australia-and-new-zealand/eswatini/">Australia and New Zealand vs Eswatini: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production
Unit
g/Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 13,403 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf