Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Luxembourg: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2.32 g/Int$
in 2024
Luxembourg
2.4 g/Int$
in 2024
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
125th
Luxembourg rank
123rd

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Luxembourg
0102030196119922024

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 2.4 g/Int$ against 2.32 g/Int$ in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.08 g/Int$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 125th and Luxembourg ranks 123rd of 211 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Democratic People's Republic of Korea averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 6.16 g/Int$ 7.04 g/Int$ 0.8863 g/Int$ Luxembourg
2010s 5.75 g/Int$ 3.84 g/Int$ 1.92 g/Int$ Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2020s 2.33 g/Int$ 2.31 g/Int$ 0.024 g/Int$ Democratic People's Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 2.4 g/Int$ against 2.32 g/Int$ in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Luxembourg?
0.08 g/Int$, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Luxembourg?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Luxembourg rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 125th and Luxembourg ranks 123rd of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Luxembourg: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-use-per-value-of-agricultural-production/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-use-per-value-of-agricultural-production/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/luxembourg/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Luxembourg: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production
Unit
g/Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 13,403 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf