Eswatini vs Southern Africa: Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production

Eswatini
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Southern Africa
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini rank
14th
Southern Africa rank
11th

Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production over time

  • Eswatini
  • Southern Africa
-50050100196219932024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Southern Africa, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 38 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Southern Africa ahead.

Eswatini ranks 14th and Southern Africa ranks 11th of 161 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Southern Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Southern Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 24.5 % change on previous year 4.52 % change on previous year 19.98 % change on previous year Eswatini
1970s -4.25 % change on previous year -1.63 % change on previous year 2.62 % change on previous year Southern Africa
1980s 8.49 % change on previous year 4.82 % change on previous year 3.67 % change on previous year Eswatini
1990s 0.4478 % change on previous year -1.56 % change on previous year 2.01 % change on previous year Eswatini
2000s 0 % change on previous year -1.62 % change on previous year 1.62 % change on previous year Eswatini
2010s 0 % change on previous year -1.46 % change on previous year 1.46 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s 0 % change on previous year -6.57 % change on previous year 6.57 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — production, Eswatini or Southern Africa?
Eswatini, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Southern Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — production between Eswatini and Southern Africa?
0 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Southern Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Southern Africa rank globally for other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — production?
Eswatini ranks 14th and Southern Africa ranks 11th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Southern Africa: Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-industrial-roundwood-non-coniferous-production-production-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-industrial-roundwood-non-coniferous-production-production-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/southern-africa/">Eswatini vs Southern Africa: Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 9,886 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.