Afghanistan vs Paraguay: Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production

Afghanistan
1.11 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay
1.34 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
40th
Paraguay rank
38th

Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Paraguay
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 1.34 m3 per square kilometre against 1.11 m3 per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.23 m3 per square kilometre.

That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.2 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 40th and Paraguay ranks 38th of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Paraguay in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6133 m3 per square kilometre 0.3633 m3 per square kilometre 0.25 m3 per square kilometre Afghanistan
1970s 0.7649 m3 per square kilometre 0.5452 m3 per square kilometre 0.2197 m3 per square kilometre Afghanistan
1980s 0.7551 m3 per square kilometre 0.9436 m3 per square kilometre 0.1885 m3 per square kilometre Paraguay
1990s 0.9495 m3 per square kilometre 1.19 m3 per square kilometre 0.2408 m3 per square kilometre Paraguay
2000s 1.11 m3 per square kilometre 1.33 m3 per square kilometre 0.2199 m3 per square kilometre Paraguay
2010s 1.11 m3 per square kilometre 1.33 m3 per square kilometre 0.2199 m3 per square kilometre Paraguay
2020s 1.11 m3 per square kilometre 1.33 m3 per square kilometre 0.2221 m3 per square kilometre Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — production, Afghanistan or Paraguay?
Paraguay, at 1.34 m3 per square kilometre against 1.11 m3 per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — production between Afghanistan and Paraguay?
0.23 m3 per square kilometre, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Paraguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Paraguay rank globally for other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — production?
Afghanistan ranks 40th and Paraguay ranks 38th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Paraguay: Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-industrial-roundwood-non-coniferous-production-production-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-industrial-roundwood-non-coniferous-production-production-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/paraguay/">Afghanistan vs Paraguay: Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
m3 per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,172 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.