Cuba vs Mongolia: Other industrial roundwood — Production, per capita
Cuba
0.0329 m3 per person
in 2024
Mongolia
0.0338 m3 per person
in 2024
Cuba rank
33rd
Mongolia rank
31st
Other industrial roundwood — Production, per capita over time
- Cuba
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.0338 m3 per person against 0.0329 m3 per person in Cuba, a difference of 0.0009 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 33rd and Mongolia ranks 31st of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0321 m3 per person | 0.0058 m3 per person | 0.0263 m3 per person | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.032 m3 per person | 0.0323 m3 per person | 0.0003 m3 per person | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.0326 m3 per person | 0.0347 m3 per person | 0.0021 m3 per person | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other industrial roundwood — production, per capita, Cuba or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.0338 m3 per person against 0.0329 m3 per person in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other industrial roundwood — production, per capita between Cuba and Mongolia?
- 0.0009 m3 per person, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mongolia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Mongolia rank globally for other industrial roundwood — production, per capita?
- Cuba ranks 33rd and Mongolia ranks 31st of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other industrial roundwood — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other industrial roundwood — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.