Latvia vs Luxembourg: Other industrial roundwood — Production, per capita
Latvia
0.1876 m3 per person
in 2024
Luxembourg
0.1469 m3 per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
2nd
Other industrial roundwood — Production, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.1876 m3 per person against 0.1469 m3 per person in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.0407 m3 per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Luxembourg's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 141 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3141 m3 per person | 0.0623 m3 per person | 0.2518 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.4419 m3 per person | 0.143 m3 per person | 0.299 m3 per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.4384 m3 per person | 0.1429 m3 per person | 0.2956 m3 per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other industrial roundwood — production, per capita, Latvia or Luxembourg?
- Latvia, at 0.1876 m3 per person against 0.1469 m3 per person in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other industrial roundwood — production, per capita between Latvia and Luxembourg?
- 0.0407 m3 per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Luxembourg rank globally for other industrial roundwood — production, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other industrial roundwood — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other industrial roundwood — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.