Côte d'Ivoire vs Iceland: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 343 t against 0 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 343 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Iceland ranks 28th of 1 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,714 t | 322.33 t | 1,392 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 250.5 t | 318.75 t | 68.25 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, Côte d'Ivoire or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 343 t against 0 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between Côte d'Ivoire and Iceland?
- 343 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Iceland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Iceland rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Iceland ranks 28th of 1 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf