Cyprus vs Luxembourg: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Cyprus
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 467 t against 45 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 422 t.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 10.4 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 26th and Luxembourg ranks 29th of 31 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 252 t | 0.25 t | 251.75 t | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 282.4 t | 170.6 t | 111.8 t | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, Cyprus or Luxembourg?
- Cyprus, at 467 t against 45 t in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between Cyprus and Luxembourg?
- 422 t, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Luxembourg?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Luxembourg rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Cyprus ranks 26th and Luxembourg ranks 29th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf