Latvia vs Mauritius: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Latvia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1,575 t against 1,037 t in Latvia, a difference of 538 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.5 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 23rd and Mauritius ranks 20th of 31 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,460 t | 805.5 t | 654.5 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 1,322 t | 918 t | 403.75 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, Latvia or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 1,575 t against 1,037 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between Latvia and Mauritius?
- 538 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Latvia ranks 23rd and Mauritius ranks 20th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf