Angola vs Mauritius: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Angola
- Mauritius
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0.57 t against 0.4 t in Mauritius, a difference of 0.17 t.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.4 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 125th and Mauritius ranks 127th of 147 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.21 t | 20.88 t | 10.33 t | Angola |
| 2010s | 24.25 t | 50.01 t | 25.76 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 198.71 t | 4.12 t | 194.59 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Angola or Mauritius?
- Angola, at 0.57 t against 0.4 t in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Angola and Mauritius?
- 0.17 t, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Mauritius?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Mauritius rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Angola ranks 125th and Mauritius ranks 127th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf