Eswatini vs India: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Eswatini
- India
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 43,698 t against 41,554 t in India, a difference of 2,144 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times India's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 17th and India ranks 18th of 147 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and India in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15,983 t | 13,400 t | 2,583 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 24,961 t | 39,458 t | 14,497 t | India |
| 2020s | 36,766 t | 44,839 t | 8,073 t | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Eswatini or India?
- Eswatini, at 43,698 t against 41,554 t in India as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Eswatini and India?
- 2,144 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and India?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and India rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 17th and India ranks 18th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf