Panama vs Zimbabwe: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Panama
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Panama currently reports 69.19 t against 56.02 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 13.17 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Panama ranks 93rd and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 147 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.47 t | 4,346 t | 4,341 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 71.81 t | 143.51 t | 71.69 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 117.69 t | 56.02 t | 61.67 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Panama or Zimbabwe?
- Panama, at 69.19 t against 56.02 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Panama and Zimbabwe?
- 13.17 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Panama ranks 93rd and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf