Bahamas vs Uruguay: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value over time
- Bahamas
- Uruguay
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 9.31 1000 USD against 6.56 1000 USD in Uruguay, a difference of 2.75 1000 USD.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.4 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uruguay ahead.
Bahamas ranks 113th and Uruguay ranks 116th of 147 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.98 1000 USD | 7.02 1000 USD | 5.04 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 4.6 1000 USD | 208.66 1000 USD | 204.06 1000 USD | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value, Bahamas or Uruguay?
- Bahamas, at 9.31 1000 USD against 6.56 1000 USD in Uruguay as of 2017.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value between Bahamas and Uruguay?
- 2.75 1000 USD, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Bahamas and Uruguay rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value?
- Bahamas ranks 113th and Uruguay ranks 116th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf