Congo vs Zimbabwe: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Congo currently reports 65.82 1000 USD against 62.19 1000 USD in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.63 1000 USD.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Congo ranks 92nd and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 147 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.54 1000 USD | 45.55 1000 USD | 40.01 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 65.82 1000 USD | 141.52 1000 USD | 75.7 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Congo, at 65.82 1000 USD against 62.19 1000 USD in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 3.63 1000 USD, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value?
- Congo ranks 92nd and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf