Bermuda vs South Sudan: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Bermuda
- South Sudan
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 4.41 t against 3.68 t in South Sudan, a difference of 0.73 t.
That makes Bermuda's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Bermuda ahead.
Bermuda ranks 171st and South Sudan ranks 174th of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bermuda averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 59.86 t | 9.19 t | 50.68 t | Bermuda |
| 2020s | 6.3 t | 19.4 t | 13.1 t | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Bermuda or South Sudan?
- Bermuda, at 4.41 t against 3.68 t in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Bermuda and South Sudan?
- 0.73 t, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and South Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Bermuda and South Sudan rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Bermuda ranks 171st and South Sudan ranks 174th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf