Botswana vs Serbia: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Botswana
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 14,242 t against 12,261 t in Botswana, a difference of 1,981 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 63rd of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,127 t | 1,396 t | 269.53 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 4,782 t | 2,772 t | 2,009 t | Botswana |
| 2020s | 9,278 t | 7,004 t | 2,274 t | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Botswana or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 14,242 t against 12,261 t in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Botswana and Serbia?
- 1,981 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Serbia rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Botswana ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 63rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf