Cambodia vs Sweden: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Cambodia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 79,567 t against 73,074 t in Cambodia, a difference of 6,493 t.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sweden ahead.
Cambodia ranks 26th and Sweden ranks 24th of 200 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 794.18 t | 101,915 t | 101,121 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 63,001 t | 95,171 t | 32,170 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 71,718 t | 92,852 t | 21,134 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Cambodia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 79,567 t against 73,074 t in Cambodia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Cambodia and Sweden?
- 6,493 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Sweden?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Sweden rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Cambodia ranks 26th and Sweden ranks 24th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf