Congo vs Suriname: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Congo
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 47.58 t against 36.12 t in Congo, a difference of 11.46 t.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 164th and Suriname ranks 161st of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.31 t | 284.24 t | 195.93 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 89.38 t | 232.25 t | 142.87 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 298.99 t | 146.88 t | 152.12 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Congo or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 47.58 t against 36.12 t in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Congo and Suriname?
- 11.46 t, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Congo ranks 164th and Suriname ranks 161st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf