Cuba vs Kyrgyzstan: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Cuba
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 237.9 t against 200.93 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 36.97 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Cuba ranks 145th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 147th of 200 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 343.08 t | 188.78 t | 154.3 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 5,745 t | 127.46 t | 5,617 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 23,344 t | 538.21 t | 22,806 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Cuba or Kyrgyzstan?
- Cuba, at 237.9 t against 200.93 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Cuba and Kyrgyzstan?
- 36.97 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Kyrgyzstan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Cuba ranks 145th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 147th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf