Cuba vs Mauritania: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Cuba
- Mauritania
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 237.9 t against 196.6 t in Mauritania, a difference of 41.3 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mauritania ahead.
Cuba ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 148th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 343.08 t | 1,580 t | 1,237 t | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 5,745 t | 832.04 t | 4,913 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 23,344 t | 1,102 t | 22,242 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Cuba or Mauritania?
- Cuba, at 237.9 t against 196.6 t in Mauritania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Cuba and Mauritania?
- 41.3 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mauritania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Mauritania rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Cuba ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 148th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf