Dominica vs South Sudan: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Dominica
- South Sudan
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 3.87 t against 3.68 t in South Sudan, a difference of 0.19 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Dominica ranks 172nd and South Sudan ranks 173rd of 185 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 57.51 t | 9.19 t | 48.32 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 27.64 t | 24.64 t | 3 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Dominica or South Sudan?
- Dominica, at 3.87 t against 3.68 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Dominica and South Sudan?
- 0.19 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and South Sudan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Dominica and South Sudan rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Dominica ranks 172nd and South Sudan ranks 173rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf