Eswatini vs Namibia: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Namibia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 3,339 t against 3,101 t in Namibia, a difference of 238 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 101st and Namibia ranks 104th of 200 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,255 t | 9,904 t | 6,649 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 12,931 t | 22,267 t | 9,336 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 4,957 t | 5,164 t | 206.6 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Eswatini or Namibia?
- Eswatini, at 3,339 t against 3,101 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Eswatini and Namibia?
- 238 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Namibia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Namibia rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 101st and Namibia ranks 104th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf