Ethiopia vs Kazakhstan: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Ethiopia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 5,779 t against 5,652 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 127 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 81st and Kazakhstan ranks 82nd of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,031 t | 1,846 t | 1,185 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 7,203 t | 3,642 t | 3,561 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 5,226 t | 6,048 t | 822.36 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Ethiopia or Kazakhstan?
- Ethiopia, at 5,779 t against 5,652 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Ethiopia and Kazakhstan?
- 127 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Kazakhstan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Kazakhstan rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Ethiopia ranks 81st and Kazakhstan ranks 82nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf