Malta vs Suriname: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Malta
- Suriname
How they compare
Malta currently reports 50.14 t against 47.58 t in Suriname, a difference of 2.56 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 159th and Suriname ranks 161st of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,215 t | 249.62 t | 965.02 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 203.77 t | 232.25 t | 28.48 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 142.67 t | 146.88 t | 4.21 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Malta or Suriname?
- Malta, at 50.14 t against 47.58 t in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Malta and Suriname?
- 2.56 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Suriname?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Suriname rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Malta ranks 159th and Suriname ranks 161st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf