Jordan vs Namibia: Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Jordan
- Namibia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 2,475 1000 USD against 2,449 1000 USD in Namibia, a difference of 26 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 91st and Namibia ranks 92nd of 200 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,790 1000 USD | 3,672 1000 USD | 882.32 1000 USD | Namibia |
| 2010s | 1,546 1000 USD | 12,476 1000 USD | 10,930 1000 USD | Namibia |
| 2020s | 2,557 1000 USD | 3,285 1000 USD | 728.2 1000 USD | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Jordan or Namibia?
- Jordan, at 2,475 1000 USD against 2,449 1000 USD in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Jordan and Namibia?
- 26 1000 USD, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Namibia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Namibia rank globally for other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Jordan ranks 91st and Namibia ranks 92nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other nitrogenous fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf