Austria vs North Macedonia: Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use
Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use over time
- Austria
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 2,565 t against 2,000 t in Austria, a difference of 565 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.3 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 44th and North Macedonia ranks 43rd of 94 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,338 t | 1,326 t | 2,011 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 2,000 t | 2,697 t | 697 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — agricultural use, Austria or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 2,565 t against 2,000 t in Austria as of 2011.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — agricultural use between Austria and North Macedonia?
- 565 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and North Macedonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Austria and North Macedonia rank globally for other np compounds — agricultural use?
- Austria ranks 44th and North Macedonia ranks 43rd of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf