Barbados vs Malta: Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use

Barbados
2 t
in 2011
Malta
2 t
in 2011
Barbados rank
83rd
Malta rank
83rd

Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use over time

  • Barbados
  • Malta
0200400600200220062011

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 2 t against 2 t in Malta, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 83rd and Malta ranks 83rd of 94 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 103.67 t 7.67 t 96 t Barbados
2010s 19.5 t 1.5 t 18 t Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other np compounds — agricultural use, Barbados or Malta?
Barbados, at 2 t against 2 t in Malta as of 2011.
What is the difference in other np compounds — agricultural use between Barbados and Malta?
0 t, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malta?
5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
How do Barbados and Malta rank globally for other np compounds — agricultural use?
Barbados ranks 83rd and Malta ranks 83rd of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
96 places, 971 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf