Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use
Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 352 t against 251 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 101 t.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 63rd and Namibia ranks 60th of 89 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.25 t | 85.75 t | 27.5 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 251 t | 352 t | 101 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — agricultural use, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 352 t against 251 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2011.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — agricultural use between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
- 101 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia rank globally for other np compounds — agricultural use?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 63rd and Namibia ranks 60th of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf