Croatia vs Luxembourg: Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use
Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use over time
- Croatia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 906 t against 775 t in Croatia, a difference of 131 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 53rd and Luxembourg ranks 51st of 94 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41,618 t | 2,686 t | 38,932 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 28,629 t | 568.67 t | 28,060 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 465 t | 745.6 t | 280.6 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — agricultural use, Croatia or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 906 t against 775 t in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — agricultural use between Croatia and Luxembourg?
- 131 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Luxembourg?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Luxembourg rank globally for other np compounds — agricultural use?
- Croatia ranks 53rd and Luxembourg ranks 51st of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf