Jamaica vs Sweden: Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use

Jamaica
197 t
in 2011
Sweden
200 t
in 2020
Jamaica rank
69th
Sweden rank
68th

Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use over time

  • Jamaica
  • Sweden
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k200220112020

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 200 t against 197 t in Jamaica, a difference of 3 t.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Jamaica ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 68th of 94 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 15.75 t 12,820 t 12,804 t Sweden
2010s 165 t 4,587 t 4,422 t Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other np compounds — agricultural use, Jamaica or Sweden?
Sweden, at 200 t against 197 t in Jamaica as of 2020.
What is the difference in other np compounds — agricultural use between Jamaica and Sweden?
3 t, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Sweden?
6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Jamaica and Sweden rank globally for other np compounds — agricultural use?
Jamaica ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 68th of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
96 places, 971 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf