Luxembourg vs Mauritius: Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use
Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use over time
- Luxembourg
- Mauritius
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 906 t against 619 t in Mauritius, a difference of 287 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.5 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Mauritius ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 50th and Mauritius ranks 53rd of 89 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,686 t | 7,256 t | 4,570 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 568.67 t | 172.5 t | 396.17 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 745.6 t | 343.4 t | 402.2 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — agricultural use, Luxembourg or Mauritius?
- Luxembourg, at 906 t against 619 t in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — agricultural use between Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 287 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Mauritius rank globally for other np compounds — agricultural use?
- Luxembourg ranks 50th and Mauritius ranks 53rd of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf