Namibia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use
Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use over time
- Namibia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 352 t against 330 t in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 22 t.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Namibia ranks 61st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 94 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.5 t | 1,063 t | 975.25 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 398.5 t | 604 t | 205.5 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — agricultural use, Namibia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Namibia, at 352 t against 330 t in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2011.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — agricultural use between Namibia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 22 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Namibia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for other np compounds — agricultural use?
- Namibia ranks 61st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf