Pakistan vs Republic of Moldova: Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use
Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use over time
- Pakistan
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 1.08 million t against 1,584 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 1.08 million t.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 684.8 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 2nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 2nd of 89 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 538,903 t | 1,979 t | 536,924 t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 778,669 t | 1,148 t | 777,520 t | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — agricultural use, Pakistan or Republic of Moldova?
- Pakistan, at 1.08 million t against 1,584 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — agricultural use between Pakistan and Republic of Moldova?
- 1.08 million t, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Republic of Moldova?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Pakistan and Republic of Moldova rank globally for other np compounds — agricultural use?
- Pakistan ranks 2nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 2nd of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf