Slovenia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use
Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use over time
- Slovenia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 330 t against 319 t in Slovenia, a difference of 11 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Slovenia ranks 62nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 61st of 89 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 723.25 t | 1,028 t | 305.25 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 516 t | 604 t | 88 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — agricultural use, Slovenia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 330 t against 319 t in Slovenia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — agricultural use between Slovenia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 11 t, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Slovenia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for other np compounds — agricultural use?
- Slovenia ranks 62nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 61st of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf