Costa Rica vs Sri Lanka: Other NP compounds — Export quantity
Other NP compounds — Export quantity over time
- Costa Rica
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 3.14 t against 2.98 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.16 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 90th and Sri Lanka ranks 89th of 107 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,834 t | 12.88 t | 1,821 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 925.45 t | 4.07 t | 921.37 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 7.92 t | 10.84 t | 2.93 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — export quantity, Costa Rica or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 3.14 t against 2.98 t in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — export quantity between Costa Rica and Sri Lanka?
- 0.16 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sri Lanka?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Sri Lanka rank globally for other np compounds — export quantity?
- Costa Rica ranks 90th and Sri Lanka ranks 89th of 107 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf