Brazil vs Lithuania: Other NP compounds — Export value
Other NP compounds — Export value over time
- Brazil
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 50,699 1000 USD against 34,325 1000 USD in Brazil, a difference of 16,374 1000 USD.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.5 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 15th and Lithuania ranks 12th of 107 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,010 1000 USD | 5,836 1000 USD | 4,174 1000 USD | Brazil |
| 2010s | 22,446 1000 USD | 6,038 1000 USD | 16,408 1000 USD | Brazil |
| 2020s | 29,419 1000 USD | 82,756 1000 USD | 53,337 1000 USD | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — export value, Brazil or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 50,699 1000 USD against 34,325 1000 USD in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — export value between Brazil and Lithuania?
- 16,374 1000 USD, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Lithuania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Lithuania rank globally for other np compounds — export value?
- Brazil ranks 15th and Lithuania ranks 12th of 107 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf