Indonesia vs Serbia: Other NP compounds — Export value
Other NP compounds — Export value over time
- Indonesia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 27,913 1000 USD against 21,309 1000 USD in Indonesia, a difference of 6,604 1000 USD.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 18th and Serbia ranks 16th of 107 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 246.99 1000 USD | 395.59 1000 USD | 148.6 1000 USD | Serbia |
| 2010s | 26,138 1000 USD | 11,953 1000 USD | 14,185 1000 USD | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 50,677 1000 USD | 36,095 1000 USD | 14,582 1000 USD | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — export value, Indonesia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 27,913 1000 USD against 21,309 1000 USD in Indonesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — export value between Indonesia and Serbia?
- 6,604 1000 USD, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Indonesia and Serbia rank globally for other np compounds — export value?
- Indonesia ranks 18th and Serbia ranks 16th of 107 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf