Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Other NP compounds — Export value
Other NP compounds — Export value over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 2.9 1000 USD against 2.2 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.7 1000 USD.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Namibia ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 89th and Namibia ranks 88th of 101 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.77 1000 USD | 91.64 1000 USD | 83.87 1000 USD | Namibia |
| 2010s | 291.85 1000 USD | 15.06 1000 USD | 276.79 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 50.4 1000 USD | 2.9 1000 USD | 47.5 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — export value, Kyrgyzstan or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 2.9 1000 USD against 2.2 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — export value between Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 0.7 1000 USD, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Namibia rank globally for other np compounds — export value?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 89th and Namibia ranks 88th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf