Singapore vs Zambia: Other NP compounds — Export value
Other NP compounds — Export value over time
- Singapore
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 110.78 1000 USD against 104.56 1000 USD in Singapore, a difference of 6.22 1000 USD.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Zambia ahead.
Singapore ranks 64th and Zambia ranks 62nd of 107 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.59 1000 USD | 266.43 1000 USD | 241.84 1000 USD | Zambia |
| 2010s | 238.41 1000 USD | 34.01 1000 USD | 204.4 1000 USD | Singapore |
| 2020s | 95.77 1000 USD | 110.78 1000 USD | 15.01 1000 USD | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — export value, Singapore or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 110.78 1000 USD against 104.56 1000 USD in Singapore as of 2022.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — export value between Singapore and Zambia?
- 6.22 1000 USD, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Zambia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Singapore and Zambia rank globally for other np compounds — export value?
- Singapore ranks 64th and Zambia ranks 62nd of 107 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf