Eswatini vs Luxembourg: Other NP compounds — Import quantity
Other NP compounds — Import quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 268.63 t against 229.98 t in Eswatini, a difference of 38.65 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Eswatini ranks 109th and Luxembourg ranks 108th of 192 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 219.95 t | 4,706 t | 4,486 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1,022 t | 1,609 t | 587 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 244.61 t | 383.29 t | 138.69 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — import quantity, Eswatini or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 268.63 t against 229.98 t in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — import quantity between Eswatini and Luxembourg?
- 38.65 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Luxembourg?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Luxembourg rank globally for other np compounds — import quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 109th and Luxembourg ranks 108th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf