Luxembourg vs Madagascar: Other NP compounds — Import quantity
Other NP compounds — Import quantity over time
- Luxembourg
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 331.58 t against 268.63 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 62.95 t.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 108th and Madagascar ranks 106th of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,706 t | 70.45 t | 4,636 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1,609 t | 1,312 t | 297.03 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 360.36 t | 1,453 t | 1,092 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — import quantity, Luxembourg or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 331.58 t against 268.63 t in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — import quantity between Luxembourg and Madagascar?
- 62.95 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Madagascar?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Madagascar rank globally for other np compounds — import quantity?
- Luxembourg ranks 108th and Madagascar ranks 106th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf