Maldives vs Saint Lucia: Other NP compounds — Import quantity
Other NP compounds — Import quantity over time
- Maldives
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 0.07 t against 0.01 t in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.06 t.
That makes Maldives's figure about 7.0 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Maldives ranks 173rd and Saint Lucia ranks 176th of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.52 t | 36.25 t | 33.73 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 21.7 t | 12.73 t | 8.97 t | Maldives |
| 2020s | 247.5 t | 0.01 t | 247.49 t | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — import quantity, Maldives or Saint Lucia?
- Maldives, at 0.07 t against 0.01 t in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — import quantity between Maldives and Saint Lucia?
- 0.06 t, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Saint Lucia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Maldives and Saint Lucia rank globally for other np compounds — import quantity?
- Maldives ranks 173rd and Saint Lucia ranks 176th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf